Note: Take this post as for humor/entertainment purpose only. It has no educational nor predictive value whatsoever.
First off they used the number 64 (or its close cousin 6.4) during its development (ie. they originally named the kernel it ran on NT 6.4). 64 isn't a very lucky hexagram, according to the I-Ching.
Second of all calling it W10 after W8.1U1 by skipping an entire number sounds kind of arrogant. You know what they say about what comes next after pride and/or arrogance.
Third, 10 is actually the 11th digit in computing terms b/c arrays start counting from 0 not 1 within the micro circuitry. 11 kind of reminds me of the 11th hour, where practically nothing happened. It was the 12th that REAL change, which would be the attainment of a sizable mobile market share to MSFT, started taking place. So, the 11th sounds kind of ominous to me.
Fourth, if we take W10 = 11 in PC terms. Then we could calculate its numerology by reducing it to a single digit as follows: 11 = 1+1 = 2. 1 is unity. 1 is masculine. 1 is Yang. 2 is feminine. 2 is Yin. And not to be sexist, but what kind of world do we live in anyways, do we live in one filled with pen1s envy or female genitalia envy?!?!
Fifth, they want to make W10 the last Windows version which basically involves points 1+2+3+4, which again reeks of arrogance and non-abidance of natural laws. Afterall, wouldn't it be better to associate a continuously evolving "living Windows fixed name/number version" to one that had nothing whatsoever to do with 64, one that didn't skip a number, one headed by Adam, or one that was the 12th of its kind?
First off they used the number 64 (or its close cousin 6.4) during its development (ie. they originally named the kernel it ran on NT 6.4). 64 isn't a very lucky hexagram, according to the I-Ching.
Second of all calling it W10 after W8.1U1 by skipping an entire number sounds kind of arrogant. You know what they say about what comes next after pride and/or arrogance.
Third, 10 is actually the 11th digit in computing terms b/c arrays start counting from 0 not 1 within the micro circuitry. 11 kind of reminds me of the 11th hour, where practically nothing happened. It was the 12th that REAL change, which would be the attainment of a sizable mobile market share to MSFT, started taking place. So, the 11th sounds kind of ominous to me.
Fourth, if we take W10 = 11 in PC terms. Then we could calculate its numerology by reducing it to a single digit as follows: 11 = 1+1 = 2. 1 is unity. 1 is masculine. 1 is Yang. 2 is feminine. 2 is Yin. And not to be sexist, but what kind of world do we live in anyways, do we live in one filled with pen1s envy or female genitalia envy?!?!
Fifth, they want to make W10 the last Windows version which basically involves points 1+2+3+4, which again reeks of arrogance and non-abidance of natural laws. Afterall, wouldn't it be better to associate a continuously evolving "living Windows fixed name/number version" to one that had nothing whatsoever to do with 64, one that didn't skip a number, one headed by Adam, or one that was the 12th of its kind?
Last edited: