Yes, I know this is an eternal question. But I can't find any conclusive information on the internet. Opinions differ widely. I have Smart Defrag installed on my XP machine and it seems to work well. I like the Health Report and boot defrag additional features too.
But when I do a defragmentation with Smart Defrag and then do a fragmentation analysis with the built-in tool, the built-in tool shows a lot of fragmentation. Which tool is to be believed?
But when I do a defragmentation with Smart Defrag and then do a fragmentation analysis with the built-in tool, the built-in tool shows a lot of fragmentation. Which tool is to be believed?