In message <idtuo3$798$(E-Mail Removed)>, Twayne
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
>+1!
+2! However, you won't change this poster: he seems to enjoy pouncing,
and name-calling (I'm sure he'll respond to one of _our_ posts, and call
us silly names too).
>
>In news:idtinm$bm8$(E-Mail Removed),
>Tim Meddick <(E-Mail Removed)> typed:
>> If someone decides that it's a good idea to reply to a post
>> from the stone age, I don't believe it requires anyone else
>> to follow in a cascade of foolishness and loose sight of
[Mind you, that should have been "lose" ... (-:]
>> common sense...
>> They will simply be alone with their solitary response -
>> and when - eventually - the poster realizes why his
>> solitary contribution is so eerily alone, he will cringe
>> inwardly with the rest of us!
(Yup, done it myself.)
>> It really does benefit no-one to call him by playground
>> names.
[I guess the name under which he posts ... (-:]
>> There should be only one unwritten rule in a group that has
>> no method to enforce any at it's disposal - keep your text
>> to the thread!
>> Your body of text has little to do with it's subject .
>>
>> ==
>>
>> Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Harden Thicke" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:idta89$910$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Hey, you idiot...
>>>
>>> < clipped >
>
>
>
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
?pu gnickab yb naem uoy tahw siht sI
|